Skip to main content
All case studies
Oil & Gas

IDMS and PCMS migration to one register

2026-05-28 · Plant-wide fixed equipment, piping circuits & historical CMLs (API 510 / 570 / 653 / ISO 14224)

Measured outcome100% of historical thickness readings, short/long corrosion rates, and inspection dates reconciled and auditable before go-live.

Many industrial operators stay on an aging Inspection Data Management System (IDMS) or spreadsheet patchwork simply because they fear losing twenty years of ultrasonic thickness history and corrosion-rate trends during a migration. When tag names differ between SAP or Maximo, the IDMS, and P&IDs, a naive import creates duplicate equipment and breaks remaining-life calculations.

Current state before intelliSPEC

  • Three versions of the equipment register: The EAM (SAP/Maximo) held functional locations for work orders, the legacy IDMS held corrosion circuits and CMLs, and unit folders held PDF inspection reports and isometric drawings that had never been digitised.
  • Inconsistent CML and point numbering: Over decades, contractors had added CMLs with conflicting naming conventions (, , , ), making automated corrosion-rate calculation unreliable.
  • Fear of multi-quarter downtime: Previous software transitions had stalled in 12-month data-cleaning projects with no working field tool.

Configured path

The operator executed a phased migration into intelliVISION, intelliNDT, and intelliINTEGRITY, while keeping two-way work-order integration with its existing EAM.

  1. ISO 14224 and CFIHOS tag resolution: Equipment tags, piping circuits, and CML hierarchies were mapped into with deduplication keys and preview validation before commit.
  2. Historical UT reading and baseline verification: Prior thickness surveys were imported into , which recomputed short-term, long-term, and governing corrosion rates alongside the legacy values so engineers could verify every variance.
  3. Assisted P&ID and PDF extraction: Historical baseline thicknesses (), design pressures, and materials of construction were extracted from legacy datasheets and P&IDs into structured fields, with each value held for engineer review.

Measured outcome

  • Zero lost thickness history: Every historical UT reading, date, and inspector attribution transferred intact, preserving multi-decade corrosion trend lines.
  • Reconciled EAM and IDMS spine: maintains the cross-reference to SAP/Maximo functional locations so findings generate work requests without duplicate asset trees.
  • Live in weeks, not quarters: Units went live progressively as each area's register passed engineering reconciliation.