Risk & reliability
For integrity engineers who own the run, repair, or replace call. A reading lands and the assessment rescores itself. You approve the next move, and the record carries it.
Built in, not bolted on
Each layer of the vessel is rescored the moment a reading lands or an operating window breaks, probability to fitness-for-service.
The bolted boundary
The head and the gasket, off
The bundle, drawn
Capabilities
03 layers · scroll to stack
An API 580-aligned five-by-five screen rescores on the reading that lands, not on the quarterly batch.
API 579-1 Level 1 metal-loss screening runs in the workflow, verdict on the backlog card.
MAWP, tMin, and MDMT run off one assessment record, routed to the code, no spreadsheet.
The next inspection window and the risk rank sit in one prioritized queue, per API 570/510.
The next date follows the asset, not the fixed interval it was born with.
The safe-operating-envelope check flags an excursion past the API 584 window for the engineer to reopen.
Corrosion, cracking, CUI, and high-temperature damage inform the score and the narrative, per API 571/583/941.
The historian data you already collect feeds probability, so risk tracks condition between turnarounds.
Spectra drafts the read. The engineer accepts, edits, or rejects it before the recommendation can be made, and the record shows which.
For the mechanical integrity engineer
Real screens from the platform, not mockups
Grounded by design
Proof
Standards referenced
Explore
03 related modules
Evaluation path
Answers
The Integrity RBI Scoring calculator runs an API 580-aligned semi-quantitative screen, scoring probability and consequence on a five-by-five matrix for every assessment. It is a screening layer structured toward API 581, not the full quantitative 581 study.
Yes. The FFS Level 1 - Metal Loss Assessment calculator applies API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Part 4 screening criteria. FFS results (acceptable, indeterminate, or unacceptable) appear on every backlog card alongside the RBI rank.
The Integrity MAWP Calculator computes maximum allowable working pressure at current measured thickness per ASME codes. The Integrity tMin Calculator routes to ASME B31.3, ASME VIII Div 1, or API 653 based on equipment type.
Three trigger types fire automatically: thickness reading below tMin, remaining life reaching a critical threshold, and manual escalation by an engineer. All three appear in the Assessment Manager and Risk Workbench.
The Integrity Inspection Interval Optimizer runs per API 570/510 and outputs one of four recommended windows (inspect within 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, or next turnaround) based on current risk rank and computed remaining life.
Yes. The API 580-aligned RBI screen plus the interval optimizer let the next inspection date follow risk and condition rather than a fixed interval, so intervals reflect the asset, not the schedule it was born with. This is the decision layer where condition-based planning lives, fed by inspection and NDE.
The safe-operating-envelope check flags an excursion past the integrity operating window (API 584) so the engineer can reopen and rescore the affected assessment, bringing a process upset into the risk picture rather than waiting for the next scheduled review.
Yes, as integration. intelliINTEGRITY is the decision layer, not the hardware. The process-historian, corrosion-probe, and permanent-monitoring data you already collect feeds probability and consequence, so live condition becomes live risk between turnarounds, with no new instruments required.
The AI advisory is generated but cannot stand on its own. An engineer must accept, edit, or reject it before the assessment can recommend an action, and the disposition records which. Skip the review and the transition is blocked.
Formulas and workflows are versioned. Completing an assessment locks the exact formula and workflow version in force at that moment, so the math and rule set behind a decision can be shown as they stood on the decision date, even after later updates.
Yes, in inch units. A B31G screen writes a provisional result that stays marked unverified until a subject-matter expert signs it, and it cannot drive a disposition until then.
CML readings from intelliNDT and field findings from intelliINSPECT feed the module continuously. Approved inspection plans route back into intelliINSPECT automatically, closing the loop without manual data transfer.
See one asset workflow, from field record to audit evidence.
